Six places the closed single-vendor bundle costs the customer.
No local expert after go-live
PSaaS rolls monitoring inside the subscription, so the customer's point of contact becomes a remote vendor SOC instead of the qualified installer who actually knows the site, the cameras, the network and the alarm panels. When the building changes, the vendor SOC does not.
One-vendor lock-in across three systems
PSaaS bundles cameras + access + intrusion under one vendor. Switching video means switching access and intrusion at the same time - cost of change is three times higher than pure VSaaS.
Forced one-size-fits-all hardware
YourSix is Axis-only on cameras. Verkada Command is Verkada-only on cameras, sensors and access. Customers with installed mixed-brand fleets cannot move to PSaaS without ripping working cameras out.
Best-in-class options locked out
PSaaS only includes what the vendor sells. Salto, Paxton, Mercury, HID, Texecom, Bosch Intrusion - all locked out if the PSaaS bundle does not integrate them. VSaaS leaves the choice to the installer who knows the site.
Geography-limited monitoring
Most PSaaS bundles only do monitoring in North America. UK, EU and AU customers either get a different service level or no monitoring at all. YourSix is US-only. Cloudastructure US-only. Verkada Command monitors selectively. TetherX runs UK + AU + global.
Camera-refresh on the vendor's cycle
PSaaS bundles the hardware into the subscription, which sounds convenient until the vendor decides the refresh cadence. Customers with cameras that still work fine end up swapping them when the subscription model says so, not when the cameras themselves call for it.
Same category. Two operating models. Two different buyers.
Both unify video + access + intrusion + monitoring in one cloud platform - that is what makes them PSaaS. The split is closed single-vendor bundle (vendor catalogue + vendor-run monitoring as a subscription line) versus open multi-vendor platform (best-in-class layer on each, installer keeps the customer relationship and the customer picks the ARC). The honest read on where each one wins and where each one costs you something.
Pure-bundle PSaaS
Strengths
One bill, one vendor accountability, one mobile app - genuinely the simplest procurement for a single-site customer who wants every layer from the same place
Hardware refresh inside the subscription removes the capex line entirely - useful for customers who specifically prefer opex
Bundled monitoring service is a real shortcut for buyers with no existing installer relationship or ARC contract to migrate
Trade-offs
Locked to the vendor's hardware catalogue (YourSix = Axis only; Verkada Command = Verkada only across cameras, sensors and access) and the vendor's monitoring footprint (mostly US-only)
No qualified-installer expert on the customer's side after go-live - the remote vendor SOC does not know the site, cameras, network or alarm panels the way the installer does
Open PSaaS (TetherX)
Strengths
Same PSaaS category - video + access + intrusion + monitoring + AI search in one cloud platform - with each layer best-of-breed and picked by the installer (1,000+ integrations, channel access-control platforms, alarm panels over standard industry protocols)
ARC monitoring to Immix, Sentinel, CONXTD, MASterMind, Bold Patriot Manitou, Stages and others - the customer's preferred ARC, not a bundled service
UK + AU built, EU + NA + APAC sites under one console; qualified installer is the customer's single point of contact, not a remote vendor SOC
Trade-offs
If the customer wants the simplest possible procurement - one bill covering cameras, access, intrusion and monitoring from a single vendor with no installer expertise required - a pure-bundle PSaaS like YourSix, Eagle Eye / Brivo or Cloudastructure is the more natural fit
Pricing figures, ownership, acquisition dates and product behaviour cited on this page are point-in-time and drawn from public sources - see the disclaimer at the bottom of this page for sourcing, "as of" date, and how to flag corrections.
Questions on VSaaS, PSaaS, PSIM and ACaaS
SaaS: Software as a Service - the parent category. Salesforce, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365.
VSaaS: Video Surveillance as a Service - cloud-managed CCTV. Cameras, recording, AI search, alarms, multi-site dashboards as a subscription. Verkada (American), Rhombus (American), Eagle Eye / Brivo (American), Videoloft (British), Milestone Arcules (Danish, Canon - merged back into Milestone July 2024), TetherX.
ACaaS: Access Control as a Service - cloud-managed doors, readers, credentials. Eagle Eye / Brivo (American) - the Brivo access-control half, founded 1999, invented the category - Avigilon Alta Access ex-Openpath (Canadian, Motorola Solutions American), Verkada Access (American), Kisi (American), Genea (American), Genetec ClearID (Canadian).
PSaaS: Physical Security as a Service - one cloud platform unifying video + access + intrusion + monitoring + automation in a single SaaS experience. Genetec's authoritative definition explicitly allows open and flexible PSaaS (multi-vendor devices), not only closed single-vendor bundles. Canonical pure-bundle PSaaS: YourSix (American, Minnesota - self-described as PSaaS on its homepage), post-merger Brivo / Eagle Eye (American), Cloudastructure (American, with bundled remote guarding). TetherX is also PSaaS by the definition - open, multi-vendor, channel-sold, monitoring service stays with the customer's ARC of choice rather than bundled inside the subscription.
PSIM: Physical Security Information Management - on-premise command-and-control middleware that sits above already-deployed security systems (VMS, access, intrusion, fire, BMS, GIS, perimeter sensors, radar, intercom) and stitches them together into one map-based operator interface. NICE Situator (Israeli, NICE Ltd.), Vidsys (American), CNL Software ipSecurityCenter (British), Tyco / Software House CCURE 9000 (American, Johnson Controls). PSIM is the enterprise / critical-national-infrastructure / safe-cities / transit-authority pattern - it does not replace your VMS or access system, it orchestrates them. PSaaS is the cloud-native answer for the same orchestration problem at mid-market scale.
Because unifying physical security in one cloud platform genuinely is different from buying VMS, access, intrusion and monitoring as four separate cloud subscriptions. PSaaS folds the layers together - the same operator works one console, one mobile app, one set of credentials, one audit trail.
Two flavours of PSaaS ship today. Pure-bundle PSaaS is the closed single-vendor version where the vendor ships the cameras, the access hardware, the intrusion bundle and the monitoring service all on its own paper - YourSix (American, self-described PSaaS on its homepage), Brivo / Eagle Eye (American, post-Dec 2025 merger) and Cloudastructure (American, with bundled remote guarding) are the canonical examples. Open PSaaS is the multi-vendor version where the platform unifies the layers but each layer is best-in-class and the installer picks the cameras, the access system and the intruder panel, and the customer picks the ARC - TetherX sits here.
Three customer-visible reasons. No single-vendor hardware lock-in: the customer's estate keeps its existing cameras (1,000+ integrations supported on TetherX) and the installer picks the right access and intruder for the site, instead of being forced onto whatever the pure-bundle vendor ships. Local installer expertise after go-live: the customer's point of contact is the qualified installer who knows the site, the cameras, the network and the alarm panels, not a remote vendor SOC. ARC of choice: monitoring runs through the customer's preferred ARC (Immix, Sentinel, CONXTD, MASterMind, Bold Patriot Manitou, Stages and others), so when the alarm goes off at 3am the operator is one the installer has already validated.
Pure-bundle PSaaS vendors get the same complaint installers raise about Verkada and Rhombus on IPVM and the r/accesscontrol forum: "They will sell around the installer, as in they have no qualms cutting you out of a deal." Open PSaaS structurally avoids that.
Honest answer: TetherX is both, and the cleanest category label is open PSaaS. By Genetec's authoritative PSaaS definition (unify access + video + intrusion + monitoring + automation in one cloud SaaS experience), TetherX hits every criterion - video (cloud recording), access control, intrusion / alarm panels, ARC monitoring over standard industry protocols, AI search and multi-site automation, all on one cloud platform.
The distinction from the closed pure-bundle PSaaS vendors (YourSix, Eagle Eye / Brivo, Cloudastructure) is that the monitoring service stays with the customer's ARC of choice rather than bundled inside the TetherX subscription, and the customer is not locked to a single camera or access-control brand. That makes TetherX the open / channel PSaaS option - PSaaS by category, with the installer keeping the customer relationship and picking the best-in-class layer on each system.
If a procurement template requires the VSaaS label specifically, TetherX is also valid VSaaS (a cloud VMS at its core). The platform is the same either way.
PSIM (Physical Security Information Management) is on-premise command-and-control middleware. It does not replace the VMS, access system or intrusion panel - it sits above them and integrates them at the data level into one map-based operator interface, with collection, correlation, verification, written standard operating procedures, reporting and audit trail (the six standard PSIM capabilities per Wikipedia).
Canonical PSIM products: NICE Situator (Israeli, NICE Ltd.), Vidsys (American), CNL Software ipSecurityCenter (British), Tyco / Software House CCURE 9000 (American, Johnson Controls).
Where PSIM still wins: enterprise / national-critical-infrastructure deployments where the operator is a 24x7 command-and-control room overseeing many heterogeneous, already-deployed security systems - airports, mass transit (London Underground, WMATA, BTP), safe-city programmes (Atlanta Operation Shield, Baltimore CitiWatch), defence, oil and gas, sea ports, large stadia. The systems are too large, too vendor-diverse and too policy-bound to rip-and-replace into a cloud-native PSaaS - PSIM orchestrates the existing investment.
Where PSaaS wins: mid-market, multi-site commercial, retail, hospitality, education, healthcare, housing - sites where the buyer is choosing a unified physical-security platform from scratch, wants cloud delivery (no on-prem command-and-control server room), and is willing to standardise on one platform rather than orchestrate four. TetherX sits in this space as an open PSaaS, integrating multi-vendor cameras, access, intrusion and ARC into one cloud console without the heavy enterprise-PSIM SOP and command-room operator workflow.
For an ARC (Alarm Receiving Centre) running an existing UL or BS8418 station, Immix is the established workflow product (more enterprise-ARC than PSIM, but adjacent) - TetherX feeds Immix natively and the two coexist. See ARC monitoring and the Immix alternative page for that detail.
YourSix wins: a single-site US customer who wants Axis cameras, no upfront hardware cost, bundled monitoring under one bill, and is happy for YourSix to handle the monitoring relationship.
TetherX wins: a multi-site customer (anywhere outside the US, or inside the US with mixed camera brands), a customer whose estate is 60% Axis and 40% other (Hanwha (South Korean), Avigilon (Canadian), Bosch (German), Hikvision (Chinese), VIVOTEK (Taiwanese), Dahua (Chinese)), or any customer who wants a qualified local installer to design, deploy and support the system end-to-end and route monitoring through a UK / EU / AU ARC of choice.
Verkada alternative (Verkada, American) is technically VSaaS + ACaaS bundled as a single Command platform - sometimes described as PSaaS in marketing. Cameras + sensors + access + intercom + Verkada Air vape-detection from one vendor. Closed proprietary cameras, $3.2B last private valuation, June 5 2026 price increase announced.
Eagle Eye / Brivo alternative (Eagle Eye / Brivo, American, branded Brivo post-Dec 29 2025 merger) is genuinely PSaaS - Eagle Eye cloud VMS heritage + Brivo cloud ACS heritage + Brivo Intrusion 2025 + Snapshot AI tie-in.
Avigilon Alta alternative (Avigilon Alta, Canadian, Motorola Solutions American) is also PSaaS-shaped post-Openpath acquisition - Alta Video (ex-Ava, acquired by Motorola for $400M alone / $449M Ava+Calipsa+Videotec bundle in March 2022) + Alta Access (ex-Openpath) + Alta Visitor under one umbrella.
PSaaS is steadily absorbing both at the mid-market end, slowly at the enterprise end. Standalone VSaaS deployments (cloud VMS only, separate access subscription, separate intruder, separate monitoring) are giving way to PSaaS - the integration layer that used to be "buy three vendors and stitch them together yourself" is being baked into the platform. TetherX is an example of that absorption: it ships as PSaaS even though many procurement templates still ask for "cloud VMS / VSaaS".
PSIM is the slower migration. Enterprise command-and-control rooms - airports, mass transit, safe-city programmes, defence, oil and gas - have decades of on-premise PSIM investment (NICE Situator, Vidsys, CNL ipSecurityCenter, CCURE 9000) sitting above heterogeneous security stacks and bound by no-cloud policy mandates. Cloud-native PSaaS is the right answer for mid-market and most commercial multi-site work, but PSIM at the top end will keep its niche for the rest of the decade.
Yes. 30-day free trial through an integrator partner with a TetherBox, full multi-system platform access (video + alarms + access + ARC integration), and a dedicated onboarding contact. No card, no commitment, extensions on request.
Want this at your site?
Get a quote from a certified TetherX installer. We will match you with a local partner who knows your area and your needs.
Need help mapping a specific deal - pure-bundle PSaaS, open PSaaS, on-prem PSIM, or just cloud VSaaS?
Try TetherX free for 30 days
Try TetherX with the access and intruder stack you already sell. Cameras + alarms + access in one console, installer keeps the monitoring. 30 days, no card.
Start Free TrialAcross the partner network
TetherX partners hold the accreditations security-procurement buyers and insurers filter on. Coverage varies by partner.
Counts reflect partners currently in the TetherX directory holding each accreditation.
Anything wrong on the VSaaS vs PSaaS vs PSIM comparison?
Flag an inaccuracy, an outdated fact, or a missing nuance on the VSaaS vs PSaaS vs PSIM page. We update the per-vendor pages and the /compare hub from this inbox - real reply, real human.
[1] About this comparison. Information about other vendors is drawn from their public product pages, datasheets, integrator forums (Reddit, vendor user groups), public CVE databases (NVD, CISA), publicly-listed LinkedIn company pages (headcount, headquarters, founding year, leadership transitions and corporate ownership signals) and customer conversations - accurate to the best of our knowledge as of Q2 2026. Pricing, features, security posture and policies change. A vendor may have shipped a fix, dropped a price, added a region or changed an architecture since this page was last reviewed.
If you believe anything here is inaccurate or out of date, please contact us and we will review and correct it. Trademarks and product names belong to their respective owners and are referenced here for identification only.
30 days free. No card. Talk to a local installer.