WHERE ALTA TILTS

Open in name, Avigilon-favoured in practice.

Avigilon-camera pull

Firmware management, analytics and feature surfacing run deepest on Avigilon-branded cameras. Multi-brand fleets feel the difference vs a genuinely brand-agnostic platform.

Annual licence cycle

Roughly $179/year per camera. Annual upfront billing is harder on customer cashflow than monthly subscription and creates a renewal cliff once a year.

Motorola scale

Motorola Solutions is a large enterprise - the upside is stability, the downside is slow product iteration vs smaller channel-focused vendors.

Mercury access standard

Mercury is a genuine open standard - that is a strength for Alta but also means access-control choice is constrained to Mercury-compatible kit.

Mobile-first access focus

94% mobile-first access adoption is a stated number. The video side of Alta is less differentiated relative to the access angle.

Cloud-region sovereignty

Hosted on Microsoft Azure, inherits Azure regions. TetherX uses regional data centres in UK / US / CA / IN / AU for direct regional sovereignty.

AVIGILON ALTA vs TETHERX

Non-proprietary or genuinely brand-agnostic?

Avigilon Alta

Practical pull toward Avigilon-branded cameras

Mercury-only access controller compatibility

Mobile-first access is the headline, video is secondary

Hosted on Microsoft Azure (inherited regions)

Motorola scale slows iteration vs smaller vendors

TetherX

200+ manufacturers, no native-brand pull

Annual platform subscription with optional per-camera services, monthly or 1-3 year billing

Integrates with multiple access ecosystems (Paxton Net2 etc)

Video, alarms and access equally first-class

Regional data centres - UK, US, CA, IN, AU regional sovereignty

Channel-only, no direct sales conflict

FAQ

Questions before you switch from Avigilon Alta

Avigilon Alta (and the older Unity) is Motorola's push into cloud-native physical security. It is non-proprietary on paper - Mercury access controllers are an open standard - but in practice integrators report a strong pull toward Avigilon-branded cameras and the Motorola ecosystem. Annual licence fees ($179/yr per camera per public price lists) and the size of Motorola complicate the SMB channel. TetherX is the smaller, faster-moving channel-only alternative that does not tilt toward any one camera brand.

Both work with non-Avigilon cameras over ONVIF. The difference is the practical pull: Avigilon firmware management, analytics and feature surfacing are deepest on Avigilon hardware. TetherX is genuinely brand-agnostic - Hanwha, Axis, Bosch, Pelco, Hikvision, Dahua, Uniview, Mobotix, i-PRO all surface equally. Integrators with multi-brand fleets see a real difference.

Mercury controllers are an open standard - one of the genuine strengths of the Alta story. If you commit to Avigilon you can re-flash Mercury controllers to move to another platform later. TetherX integrates with the broader access-control ecosystem (Paxton Net2 and others) - different design philosophy, both valid. The right answer depends on the integrator's existing access stack.

Avigilon Alta lists at approximately $179/year per camera licence on Microsoft Azure infrastructure. TetherX is an annual platform subscription priced by channel count through your channel partner, with cloud recording and AI as optional per-camera services - monthly billing or prepay 1-3 year terms. The flexibility on billing cadence and the per-camera-optional services are friendlier on customer cashflow than an annual licence-per-camera upfront pattern.

Yes. TetherX is cloud-native, but every site runs a TetherBox gateway (TetherBox software on an existing server or PC at the site, or a dedicated unit from the range - compact in-vehicle through to rackmount, see the range) - the cameras stay on the site network behind it with no direct Internet access, and the TetherBox is the only thing that talks to the cloud. Alta is built on Microsoft Azure; TetherX hosts in regional data centres in UK, US, Canada, India and Australia, and can spin up new local clouds on demand where a customer needs data residency in a region we do not yet host in - including dedicated private clouds. Both are real cloud platforms with different hosting strategies - Alta inherits Azure's footprint, TetherX is closer to the data with regional sovereignty.

Yes. 30 days through an integrator partner, TetherBox included, full platform access. Extensions on request.
ALSO COMPARED

See TetherX against another VMS

Researching options? Read the side-by-side for each VMS the channel asks about most.

Immix

Workflow on top of brittle third-party integrations vs cloud VMS that records natively.

HikCentral

Hikvision's central VMS - cloud-native vs Windows-server architecture.

Milestone

Per-MAC perpetual licensing vs cloud subscription.

Verkada

Closed proprietary ecosystem vs open cameras, no lock-in.
See all comparisons

Still have questions about pricing or access integrations?

Read the full FAQ

Try TetherX free for 30 days

Run TetherX alongside an existing Alta install. Extensions on request.

Start Free Trial

About this comparison. Information about other vendors is drawn from their public product pages, datasheets, integrator forums (Reddit, vendor user groups), public CVE databases (NVD, CISA) and customer conversations - accurate to the best of our knowledge as of 21 May 2026. Pricing, features, security posture and policies change. A vendor may have shipped a fix, dropped a price, added a region or changed an architecture since this page was last reviewed.

If you believe anything here is inaccurate or out of date, please contact us and we will review and correct it. Trademarks and product names belong to their respective owners and are referenced here for identification only.